If you have 1 enemy and you restrain them, they SHOULD lose. Why is lotus strike applying like 7 effects why also doing more damage than anyhing else? It also applies 'action damage'. The interaction system is unexplained, boring and essentially just a massive list of things you can't unless you ask nicely so why do the other options even exist The shop exists purely to make the game less fun to play and experiement with it adds nothing of value and actively detracts from the game Poor combat balance (add more 2 v 2 fights and maybe even a 2 v 1 favoring you to mess with) Poor QoL (text speed, explanations, convience like starting with a dungeon) Right now to me the main issues can be summarized as If you do something like 'oral healing' it should actually have an animation. Oh and personally I don't think you are dreaming too big at all or off to a bad start. LoK models are very easy to play with, most of the systems are already in place and just need touching up.Ĭlick to expand.Well when someone sees "Darkest Dungeon + Pokemon + SlaveMaker " people might think you would get the best concept of each and put it together. In Slavemaker you got to create your character then build it up. We recommend against running a system at these extreme settings in the long run, so as not to cut component lifetime down too much.The picture hardly mattered, in fact it was grabbed from google but the traits mattered.ĭarkest Dungeon I don't fully remember but I believe you got to create your first party and you are the party leader. The test system was based on a Gigabyte GA-965P-DQ6, and reached an amazing 485 MHz FSB speed at stability sufficient for benchmarking. The big gun Gigabyte 3D Galaxy II liquid cooler brought far greater success:3.33 GHz at 417 MHz FSB and 1.52 V!"ĥ00 MHz FSB? Core 2 Duo Overtakes Core 2 Extreme Adding the CNPS9700 LED brought down those temperatures phenomenally, but only got us to 3.15 GHz at 394 MHz FSB and 1.48 V before things once again got too hot. "Using the stock cooler, we were able to reach 3.1 GHz at 387 MHz FSB and 1.45 V using the Intel stock cooler, where increasing the voltage only made the CPU overheat sooner. I can only recommend to you reading these articles:Ĭheap Thrills: Core 2 Duo E6400 Overclocked to 3.33 GHz Well, Core 2 Duo are rumored to have a really good overclocking potential. 2 threads) the results would have been even more different. I don't know if you can incorporate them, but maybe if it could enable multithreading (eg.
SPEED20 XBENCH PC
But as we progress, and the encode uses higher and slower settings (in comparison), the rest of the PC can handle the flow and it appears the encode then gets more dependant on the CPU which is why the gap in results then becomes more apparent, it becomes a much better test between the different processors and speeds. The encode is using low (fast) speed encode settings so I would assume here the CPU is not the bottleneck and it's the rest of the PC (board/ram/hard drive) that's struggling to keep up, hence the similar value. Notice the first test is almost the same between mine and yours, even though I'm running 2.4 and you at 3.5.
SPEED20 XBENCH FOR FREE
Thanks for posting the screenshots, nice to see the different numbers on the different That's some over-clocking you got going there, I had my old p4 (2.4GHz) clocked at 3GHz for years, it gave me a warm feeling knowing I was getting something for free But a 2.4 to 3.5, phew, I'd be scared, I wanna stick mine up to 2.8 or maybe 3.0 but untill I get hold of a decent modern mATX board that actually has some overclocking features I'm stuffed. No need to apologise, at least it gave us all something to chat about. Anyway, I'm sorry that I made this thread off-topic, but the results really surprised me.
0 kommentar(er)
